Label transfer incorporates crosslinking methodology to study protein-protein interactions by labeling proteins that interact with a protein of interest. This approach can be used to discover new interactions, confirm putative interactions suggested by other methods and investigate the interface of interacting proteins. In addition, the label transfer method is able to detect weak or transient protein interactions that often evade detection in co-immunoprecipitation and pull-down methods.

Label Transfer Methodology

In a typical label transfer reaction, a bait protein reacts with a reactive moiety of a label transfer reagent (LTR), forming a covalent bond with the heterobifunctional crosslinker linked to a radioactive, fluorescent or biotin label, as diagramed below. This labeled bait protein is then allowed to interact with prey protein in vitro to form a complex, after which the reaction is exposed to UV light to activate a photoreactive group moiety on the crosslinker, which then covalently binds to the prey protein. The label transfer is completed by cleaving the crosslinker spacer arm to release the bait protein, leaving the label attached to the interacting prey protein, which can be detected through multiple methods. A biotin label is especially useful in this process, because it can be used for both the purification and detection of the prey protein. The protein-protein interaction can then be analyzed by multiple methods, including Western blot analysis, protein sequence analysis and mass spectrometry.

General diagram of label transfer reaction.

Traditional Label Transfer Reagents

Iodinated Labels for Autoradiography

The earliest examples of label transfer reagents incorporated a photoreactive phenyl azide group that contained a hydroxy-phenyl modification on the ring. The phenolic hydroxyl activates the ring for substitution reactions to occur ortho or paro to its position. These compounds can be radioiodinated using typical oxidation reagents such as chloramine T or a commercial iodination reagent. Iodination of the crosslinker with I-125 prior to its use results in a radioactive label transfer reagent that can tag an unknown interacting protein with a radiolabel after cleavage of the crosslinker's spacer arm.

The crosslinker is first radio-iodinated and then reacted with a bait protein, typically through available amine groups. This modified protein is then added to a sample and allowed to interact with other proteins, and the sample is exposed to UV light to photo-crosslink the interacting complex. At this point, the label facilitates the detection of the interacting proteins, or the complex can be cleaved and the radiolabel transferred to the protein interacting with the bait. The now radiolabeled, unknown protein is then detected by autoradiography after separation by electrophoresis and Western blot analysis.

The first reagents employed using this method were bifunctional and were designed so that the photoreactive moiety bears the transferable label. These molecules are either amine- or sulfhydryl-reactive and are labeled radioisotopically with I-125.

Disadvantages of Traditional Iodinated Reagents

Although these reagents have been used successfully to obtain data on protein interactions, they possess some inherent deficiencies compared to trifunctional reagents designed for label transfer applications. The user should be aware of the following characteristics of these reagents:

  • Reagents require labeling with I-125 before use, and the efficiency of label incorporation is low.
  • The photo-activation step can result in several unproductive pathways that lower the crosslinking yield between bait and prey.
  • The I-125 label can be released during the light reaction, causing nonspecific labeling of the protein(s) in the mix.

Newer kinds of compounds have been developed as trifunctional reagents that more adequately segregate the reactive sites from the label. Increasingly, these new kinds of reagents include non-radioisotopic labels such as biotin.

Nonradioactive Label Transfer Reagents


Subsequent designs of bifunctional label transfer reagents use nonradioactive labels to avoid the safety issues posed by I-125. Fluorescent constituents designed into cleavable photo-reactive crosslinkers provide a method to transfer a fluorescent label to an unknown interacting protein. Using this approach, the reagent is nonfluorescent prior to exposure to UV light, but upon photolyzing and coupling to interacting proteins, the crosslinking molecule fluoresces.

These reagents also have a disulfide bond that can be reduced, resulting in the cleavage of the crosslinked proteins and the transfer of the label to the unknown interacting species. The fluorescently labeled interacting protein can then be followed in cells to determine the site of interactions or the fate of the proteins after the interaction occur.


Label transfer reagents can also have biotin built into the bifunctional structure of a crosslinking molecule. After reacting with the bait and prey proteins as diagrammed above, the crosslinker is cleaved, resulting in a biotin-labeled prey protein that can be used to detect the protein.

This type of trifunctional label transfer method differs substantially from the bifunctional methods previously discussed because of the wide variety of methods available to detect the prey protein. Because the protein is biotinylated, both chromogenic and fluorescent approaches can be used to detect the protein via avidin-, streptavidin- or NeutrAvidin protein-conjugated horseradish peroxidase (HRP), alkaline phosphatase (AP) or fluorescent molecule. Additionally, the biotin handle can be used to purify the prey protein or protein fragments using avidin-, streptavidin or NeutrAvidin protein-conjugated agarose or magnetic bead chromatography.

Since biotin was first used in label transfer applications, this approach is increasingly used to detect protein-protein interactions, as listed below:

  • Define the interactions of complexes with activator domains (1)
  • Clarify the mechanism of protein complex assembly (2)
  • Study docking site and factor requirements for binding (3)
  • Describe the binding contacts of interactors (4)
  • Confirm the recognition of a specific phosphoepitope (5)
  • Search for putative binding partners (6)
  • Gain insight into chaperone-mediated refolding interactions (7)
  • Investigate the mechanism of protein interaction (8)
  • Facilitate receptor activity-directed affinity tagging (re-tagging)(9)
  • Detect low-abundance protein receptors
  • Understand drug-receptor interactions (10)


  1. Neely K. E. et al. (2002) Transcription activator interactions with multiple swi/snf subunits. Mol Cell Biol. 22, 1615-25.
  2. Ishmael F. T. et al. (2002) Assembly of the bacteriophage t4 helicase: Architecture and stoichiometry of the gp41-gp59 complex. J Biol Chem. 277, 20555-62.
  3. Trotman L. C. et al. (2001) Import of adenovirus DNA involves the nuclear pore complex receptor can/nup214 and histone h1. Nat Cell Biol. 3, 1092-100.
  4. Horney M. J. et al. (2001) Synthesis and characterization of insulin-like growth factor (igf)-1 photoprobes selective for the igf-binding proteins (igfbps). Photoaffinity labeling of the igf-binding domain on igfbp-2. J Biol Chem. 276, 2880-9.
  5. Daum J. R. et al. (2000) The spindle checkpoint of saccharomyces cerevisiae responds to separable microtubule-dependent events. Curr Biol. 10, 1375-8.
  6. Kleene R. et al. (2000) Sh3 binding sites of zg29p mediate an interaction with amylase and are involved in condensation-sorting in the exocrine rat pancreas. Biochemistry. 39, 9893-900.
  7. Minami Y. et al. (2000) A critical role for the proteasome activator pa28 in the hsp90-dependent protein refolding. J Biol Chem. 275, 9055-61.
  8. Sharma K. K. et al. (2000) Synthesis and characterization of a peptide identified as a functional element in alphaa-crystallin. J Biol Chem. 275, 3767-71.
  9. Ilver D. et al. (1998) Helicobacter pylori adhesin binding fucosylated histo-blood group antigens revealed by retagging. Science. 279, 373-7.
  10. Jacobson K. A. et al. (1995) Molecular probes for muscarinic receptors: Functionalized congeners of selective muscarinic antagonists. Life Sci. 56, 823-30.