Thermo Fisher Scientific

Your educational resource for biopharma, pharma, environmental, food and agriculture, industrial, and clinical labs

  • Categories
    • Advancing Materials
    • Advancing Mining
    • AnalyteGuru
    • Analyzing Metals
    • Ask a Scientist
    • Behind the Bench
    • Biotech at Scale
    • Clinical Conversations
    • Examining Food
    • Identifying Threats
    • Illuminating Semiconductors
    • Life in Atomic Resolution
    • Life in the Lab
    • OEMpowered
    • The Connected Lab
  • About Us
  • Contact
Accelerating ScienceAnalyteGuru / Food and Beverage / Toxic Gases in Food and the Threat of Ethylene Oxide

Toxic Gases in Food and the Threat of Ethylene Oxide

By Petra Gerhards, Regional Marketing Manager GC and GC/MS, EMEA, Thermo Fisher Scientific 09.01.2021

Introduction

Ethylene Oxide (EtO) has been banned within the EU since 1991. Countries like Germany had already banned it in 1981. But it is still used in countries like India, the U.S. and Canada to kill bacteria and fungus on food such as sesame seeds, oil seeds in general, nuts and guar gum. Since July 2021, all products in the EU containing EtO above the LOQ of 0.1 mg/kg had to be withdrawn from the market. This decision was made by the EU committee.

This applies not only to raw materials, but also to finished food products. Guar gum (E410) can be found in ice cream, jams, meat and baking products. In France, already hundreds of ice creams have had to be withdrawn from the market.

The BfR (Federal Bureau of risk management) stated that EtO can be linked to cancer and shows a mutagenic effect. In regard to sesame, 34 contaminated seeds can contain enough EtO to be a serious health risk.

The EU stated a LOD of 0.05 mg/kg, which contains the sum of EtO and its metabolite 2-Chlorethanol, expressed as EtO.

Now why is this suddenly so important? There were several statements/publications online in 2020 claiming that EtO can be used to sterilize COVID-19. This may be right for medical devices, however, food is a different story.

Suddenly, additional food groups are exposed to EtO and — even in finished products — EtO was measured way above the LOQ in lots of finished products. Complete food lots had to be removed from the market.

How can you measure EtO?

There are two methods available today.

The first method is based on a GC-MS method from November 1999. [1]

This German Governmental method describes a procedure that determines Ethylene Oxide as the sum of Ethylene Oxide and 2-Chloroethanol. It is based on the transition of 2-Chloroethanol to Ethylene Oxide followed by the derivatization with iodide and the detection of the formed Iodidiethanol with GC. The method is very time-consuming; only six samples per day can be prepared by an experienced person. However, it is a well-proven and precise method.

The second method is based on a GC-MS/MS method developed in December 2020.

The detection limit of EtO that needs to be accomplished is 0.05 mg/kg. To reach this requires a special sample preparation and a GC-MS/MS method in SRM (Single-Reaction-Mode). The CVUA in Stuttgart (Germany) published an EURL-SRM in December 2020, utilizing a Thermo Scientific™TRACE™1310 gas chromatograph and a Thermo Scientific™ TSQ™ 9000 GC triple quadrupole.

Let’s start with the sample preparation

As mentioned in the CVUA’s single residue method for the analysis of Ethylene Oxide and its metabolite 2-Chloroethanol the QuEChERS EN 15662 method and GC-MS/MS were used. Therefore 2 g of sample, into which standards and Acetonitrile are added, and the sample is vortexed for five minutes. The EN 15662 extraction kit contains 4 g of anhydrous MgSO4, 1 g of NaCl, 1 g of Trisodium Citrate and 500 mg of Disodium Citrate. After shaking for one minute the sample is centrifuged at 5000 rpm for five minutes. 1 ml supernatant is transferred into a microcentrifuge tube containing 150 mg MgSO4, 25 mg PSA and 25 mg C18. It is vortexed for 30 seconds and afterwards centrifuged at 5000 rpm. The supernatant is transferred into a GC vial.

GC-MS analysis

Those parameters were developed for a Thermo Scientific™ ISQ™ 7000 GC single quadrupole system in a German food control lab.

Analytical parameters

Injector PTV (Programmable Temperature Vaporizing)
Injector Mode Splitless
Injection Volume 1µl
Flow Control Mode Constant Flow
Column Flow 1.00 ml/min
Carrier Gas Helium 6.0
Total Run Time 30 min
GC Program 50 °C, 1 min (hold) with 25 °C/min, to 200 °C, 23 min (hold)
Column Carbowax, 30 m, 0.25 mm I.D., 0.25 µm film

GC-MS/MS parameters

Method Type Selected-Ion-Monitoring (SIM)
MS transfer line temperature 250 °C
Ion source temperature 250 °C
Ionization EI
m/z Iodidiethanol RT 6.44 min

127, 128, 141, 142, 172

Results

The following figures show the results on a sesame seed sample, generated by following the German § 35 LMBG method.

Fig.1: Real sesame seed sample containing 0.406 mg/kg Ethylene Oxide.

Fig.2: Calibration curve for Iodidiethanol. The method LOQ was determined with 0.02 mg/kg.

GC-MS/MS analysis

The CVUA in Stuttgart details a Thermo Scientific™TRACE™1310 gas chromatograph, a Thermo Scientific™ TSQ™ 9000 GC triple quadrupole and a TriPlus RSH autosampler.

Analysis can be performed on a TG-624 MS 30 m, 0.32 mm I.D X 0.25 mm film.

The following method and data were developed in a Thermo Fisher Scientific lab, based on the method by the CVUA Stuttgart with spiked sesame seed samples.

Analytical parameters

Injector SSL (Split/Splitless)
Injector mode Split
Injection volume 1µl
Injector Temperature 280 °C
Flow Control Mode Constant Flow
Column Flow 2.00 ml/min
Carrier Gas Helium 6.0
Split Ratio 5:1
Purge Flow 5 ml/min
Split Flow 10 ml/min
Total Run Time 25 min
GC Program 40 °C, 2 min (hold) with 5 °C/min, 40-90 °C, 50 °C/min 90-225 °C, 10.3 min (hold)

GC-MS/MS parameters

Method Type t-SRM mode
MS transfer line temperature 230 °C
Ion source temperature 250 °C
Ionization EI
SRM transitions Ethylene Oxide Q1 m/z Q3 m/z CE (V)

44 14 20

44 28 5

44 29 5

2-Chloroethanol Q1 m/z Q3 m/z CE (V)

80 31 5

80 43 5

82 31 5

Results

Fig. 3: Total Ion Chromatogram (TIC) at 0.025 mg/kg EtO and 2-CE.

Fig. 4: Matrix-matched calibration curve for EtO and 2-CE in the range of 0.005-0.2 mg/kg.

Fig. 5: Sensitivity observed for EtO and 2-CE in the matrix matched standard at 0.025 mg/kg.

Conclusion

  • EtO becomes more and more of a topic in the EU. Since lots of products need to be withdrawn from the market on a daily base, the importance to control for EtO is clear.
  • The risk assessment from the BfR shows why it is necessary to protect consumers from dangerous levels of EtO.
  • As this blog post shows, there are proven methods available that detect EtO to the required levels in all kind of food matrices.
  • A disadvantage of the § 64 LFGB method is the time required for the sample preparation. Only six samples can be processed per day, however it is a very precise method.
  • The advantage of the GC-MS/MS method is the speed due to the QuEChERS EN 15662 method. It provides enough specificity and sensitivity for the detection of EtO and its metabolite 2-Chloroethanol.
  • This is a plug and play method that is already established in the GC and food market.

[1] Amtliche Sammlung von Untersuchungsverfahren nach §64 LFGB; Gaschomatographische Bestimmung von Ethylenoxid und 2-Chloroethanol in Gewürzen

Petra Gerhards

Petra Gerhards, Dipl-Ing, is Regional Marketing Manager of GC and GC-MS for EMEA at Thermo Fisher Scientific. She has more than 29 years of experience in the fields of GC-MS, SPE and LC-MS. Since joining the regional team she has contributed to workflow solutions combining vials and closures with SPE solutions, GC-MS and LC-MS. She works with KOL's on data for regional specific marketing campaigns, organizes in-house seminars and works on customer specific solutions. Her main expertise is in the field of doping and drugs-of-abuse analysis.
Nitrosamine Impurity Analysis: Every Tool You Will Ever Need
Changed Drug Behavior Under COVID-19

Privacy StatementTerms & ConditionsLocationsSitemap

© 2025 Thermo Fisher Scientific. All Rights Reserved.

Talk to us