{"id":3854,"date":"2015-02-18T07:00:09","date_gmt":"2015-02-18T12:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/?p=3854"},"modified":"2016-04-29T16:51:56","modified_gmt":"2016-04-29T16:51:56","slug":"comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/","title":{"rendered":"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2015\/02\/cation_chromatography.png\" style=\"float: left;margin: 10px\" alt=\"cation exchange chromatography\" width=\"384\" height=\"403\" \/>Designing tandem mass spectrometry (MS\/MS)-based proteomics experiments requires choosing the best protein and peptide separation method available for optimal proteome coverage. But how does&nbsp;a researcher decide which method is best? Mostovenko et al. (2013) provide a neat summary exploring this conundrum, giving insight into which of three of the most popular methods&mdash;strong cation exchange (SCX) chromatography, peptide isoelectric focusing (pIEF) and sodium dodecyl sulfate&ndash;polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS-PAGE)&mdash;deliver the best results, along with the experimental conditions under which these methods&nbsp;are best applied.<sup>1<\/sup><\/p>\n<p>In addition to comparing each method using standard samples for consistency, the researchers also looked at the additional information available from each process. Because prefractionation is used to reduce the complexity of samples prior to MS analysis, physical characteristics for each fraction can be picked up by different algorithms and used to refine peptide matches and predictions arising from the raw spectral data. For example, SDS-PAGE separation gives molecular weight ranges for each gel slice prepared for MS, whereas pIEF shows the&nbsp;isoelectric point.<\/p>\n<p>For consistency, the scientists used two samples&mdash;<em>Escherichia coli <\/em>cell lysates and human plasma&mdash;for analysis. Each sample underwent appropriate trypsin digestion (e.g., in-gel digestion following SDS-PAGE preparation; in-solution digestion was utilized&nbsp;prior to pIEF and SCX). SDS-PAGE and pIE<span>F were carried out under standard methodologies. <\/span>SCX fractionation was carried out using the Dionex UltiMate 3000 LC system (Thermo Scientific). Mostovenko and colleagues then examined the peptide digests using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography&nbsp;(PepMap C18 columns, Thermo Scientific)&ndash;MS\/MS analysis. The team processed all resulting data as one batch within a single Taverna workflow.<\/p>\n<p>The results showed that SCX fractionation gave the best proteome coverage of all three methods, for both samples. The method identified 1,139 proteins from 6,731 peptides in the <em>E. coli<\/em> sample&nbsp;and 183 proteins from 1,642 peptides in the human plasma sample. Relative to full UniProt FASTA sequences, this represented 35% and 29% mean protein coverages, respectively. For SDS-PAGE, the results were 34% and 23%, and for pIEF they were&nbsp;27% and 24%.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers then examined whether the additional information gleaned from each method could improve the resulting data. They found that, using pH, they&nbsp;could determine outliers in the pIEF fractionation method, since separation into fractions was consistently linear according to this parameter.&nbsp;Similarly, using parent-protein molecular weights to compare peptide identity predictions with gel slice location pre-digestion&nbsp;also aided in&nbsp;outlier detection for the&nbsp;SDS-PAGE prepared samples.<\/p>\n<p>Although the experimental results pointed strongly to SCX&nbsp;as the best fractionation method for proteomic characterization, the researchers suggest that initial sample loading could be a limiting factor. For example, the optimal protein load for SDS-PAGE samples is 30 &mu;g, whereas for pIEF it is 50 &mu;g, and SCX can handle loads in excess of 100 &mu;g. They also acknowledge that in keeping the LC-MS\/MS parameters standard and consistent, it may not have been possible to achieve optimal operating conditions for each fractionation method, thus compromising results.<\/p>\n<p>Despite the experimental limitations, the authors comment that the&nbsp;combining of analyses into one Taverna workflow was successful and&nbsp;allowed efficient comparison of three separate data sets. Furthermore, when deciding which method to use, they found it&nbsp;important to&nbsp;take into account&nbsp;the value of additional information provided by each fractionation process, a consideration&nbsp;that can enhance the proteomic data collected.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reference<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>1. Mostovenko, E., et al. (2013) &#8220;<a href=\"http:\/\/www.sciencedirect.com\/science\/article\/pii\/S2212968513000068\" target=\"_blank\">Comparison of peptide and protein fractionation methods in proteomics<\/a>&#8220;, EuPA Open Proteomics, 1 (pp. 30&ndash;7), doi: 10.1016\/j.euprot.2013.09.001.<\/p>\n<p><i>Post Author: Amanda Maxwell. Mixed media artist; blogger and social media communicator; clinical scientist and writer.<\/p>\n<p>A digital space explorer, engaging readers by translating complex theories and subjects creatively into everyday language.<\/i><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Designing tandem mass spectrometry (MS\/MS)-based proteomics experiments requires choosing the best protein and peptide separation method available for optimal proteome coverage. But how does&nbsp;a researcher decide which method is best? Mostovenko et al. (2013) provide a neat summary exploring this conundrum, giving insight into which of three of the most popular methods&mdash;strong cation exchange (SCX)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":21,"featured_media":3853,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[12],"tags":[368,369,370,371,174,279,372,373],"division":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-3854","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-methods","8":"tag-gel-electrophoresis","9":"tag-ief","10":"tag-isoelectric-focusing","11":"tag-protein-prefractionation","12":"tag-scx","13":"tag-sds-page","14":"tag-strong-cation-exchange","15":"tag-uhplc","16":"entry"},"_selected_authors":"","_selected_reviewers":"","acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.8 (Yoast SEO v27.8) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"A comparison of three common protein prefractionation methods used in shotgun proteomics analysis, and analysis of additional value in data processing.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"A comparison of three common protein prefractionation methods used in shotgun proteomics analysis, and analysis of additional value in data processing.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Accelerating Proteomics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/thermofisher\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2015-02-18T12:00:09+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-29T16:51:56+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/cation_chromatography.png\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"582\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"610\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/png\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Amanda Maxwell\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@thermofisher\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@thermofisher\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Amanda Maxwell\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Amanda Maxwell\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f572b16973d4ff71460b75a0a41a3632\"},\"headline\":\"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-02-18T12:00:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-29T16:51:56+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":632,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/cation_chromatography.png\",\"keywords\":[\"gel electrophoresis\",\"IEF\",\"isoelectric focusing\",\"protein prefractionation\",\"SCX\",\"SDS-PAGE\",\"strong cation exchange\",\"UHPLC\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Methods\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/cation_chromatography.png\",\"datePublished\":\"2015-02-18T12:00:09+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-29T16:51:56+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f572b16973d4ff71460b75a0a41a3632\"},\"description\":\"A comparison of three common protein prefractionation methods used in shotgun proteomics analysis, and analysis of additional value in data processing.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/cation_chromatography.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2015\\\/02\\\/cation_chromatography.png\",\"width\":582,\"height\":610,\"caption\":\"cation exchange chromatography\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Accelerating Proteomics\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/f572b16973d4ff71460b75a0a41a3632\",\"name\":\"Amanda Maxwell\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/80b1d135aff6be035b6cc16276a4d7f56aa67c117044edb6d87067d0ffa40ae5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/80b1d135aff6be035b6cc16276a4d7f56aa67c117044edb6d87067d0ffa40ae5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/80b1d135aff6be035b6cc16276a4d7f56aa67c117044edb6d87067d0ffa40ae5?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Amanda Maxwell\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/author\\\/amandamaxwell\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics","description":"A comparison of three common protein prefractionation methods used in shotgun proteomics analysis, and analysis of additional value in data processing.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics","og_description":"A comparison of three common protein prefractionation methods used in shotgun proteomics analysis, and analysis of additional value in data processing.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/","og_site_name":"Accelerating Proteomics","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/thermofisher","article_published_time":"2015-02-18T12:00:09+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-29T16:51:56+00:00","og_image":[{"width":582,"height":610,"url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/cation_chromatography.png","type":"image\/png"}],"author":"Amanda Maxwell","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@thermofisher","twitter_site":"@thermofisher","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Amanda Maxwell","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/"},"author":{"name":"Amanda Maxwell","@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#\/schema\/person\/f572b16973d4ff71460b75a0a41a3632"},"headline":"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics","datePublished":"2015-02-18T12:00:09+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-29T16:51:56+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/"},"wordCount":632,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/cation_chromatography.png","keywords":["gel electrophoresis","IEF","isoelectric focusing","protein prefractionation","SCX","SDS-PAGE","strong cation exchange","UHPLC"],"articleSection":["Methods"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/","url":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/","name":"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/cation_chromatography.png","datePublished":"2015-02-18T12:00:09+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-29T16:51:56+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#\/schema\/person\/f572b16973d4ff71460b75a0a41a3632"},"description":"A comparison of three common protein prefractionation methods used in shotgun proteomics analysis, and analysis of additional value in data processing.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/cation_chromatography.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/cation_chromatography.png","width":582,"height":610,"caption":"cation exchange chromatography"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/comparing-protein-and-peptide-fractionation-methods-for-proteomics\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Comparing Protein and Peptide Fractionation Methods for Proteomics"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/","name":"Accelerating Proteomics","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#\/schema\/person\/f572b16973d4ff71460b75a0a41a3632","name":"Amanda Maxwell","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/80b1d135aff6be035b6cc16276a4d7f56aa67c117044edb6d87067d0ffa40ae5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/80b1d135aff6be035b6cc16276a4d7f56aa67c117044edb6d87067d0ffa40ae5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/80b1d135aff6be035b6cc16276a4d7f56aa67c117044edb6d87067d0ffa40ae5?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Amanda Maxwell"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/author\/amandamaxwell\/"}]}},"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2015\/02\/cation_chromatography.png","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3854","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/21"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3854"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3854\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/3853"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3854"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3854"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3854"},{"taxonomy":"division","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/division?post=3854"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}