{"id":7620,"date":"2016-02-12T07:00:54","date_gmt":"2016-02-12T12:00:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/?p=7620"},"modified":"2016-04-29T16:53:02","modified_gmt":"2016-04-29T16:53:02","slug":"proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/","title":{"rendered":"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" src=\"http:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2016\/02\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg\" style=\"float: left;margin: 10px\" alt=\"Two poplar tree. Image: TatyanaKokoulina\/Shutterstock.com\" width=\"330\" height=\"220\" \/>Poplar trees are a valuable model system for studying changes in biomass. Recently, Szuba et al. published the results of a proteomics workflow for investigating differences in poplars growing on separate plots.<sup>1<\/sup> T<\/span>he team wanted to determine if there were any differences in growth or any evidence of stress when they grew poplars in grassland irrigated for 40 years with wastewater left over<span class=\"thread\"> from the potato industry.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>Szuba et al. planted one-year rooted cuttings with a single stem and of similar height in early March. Within each site (potato-irrigated grassland and normal-conditioned forest), <span class=\"thread\">they planted trees using a randomized block design and included <\/span>five types of poplar trees: <em>Populus alba Villafranca<\/em> (P. VF), P<em>opulus deltoides &times; maximowiczii Eridano<\/em> (P. ER), <em>Populus maximowiczii &times; trichocarpa<\/em> NE-42 (P. NE), <em>Populus &times; interamericana Hoogvorst<\/em> (P. HOO) and <em>Populus &times; euramericana Robusta<\/em> (P. ROB). The authors selected two tree species (P. VF and P. ER) for proteomic analysis.<\/p>\n<p>The trees grew for four years, during which the researchers gave no supplementary nutrients or water to the trees. After this time&nbsp;passed, the authors collected specimens from the trees, first collecting leaves from one individual tree. Afterwards, they utilized a &#8220;mixed sample&#8221; procedure where they collected leaf material from 10 to 15 specimens and then pooled samples, each containing a mix of three to five&nbsp;randomly selected leaves.<\/p>\n<p>To identify any significant changes in protein levels, they extracted proteins from leaves and roots and isoelectrofocused and separated proteins using two-dimensional electrophoresis with coomassie staining. They identified spots of interest in the gel using a maximum analysis of variance (ANOVA) of 0.01 and ratio &ge;1.2&nbsp;prior to analysis with an <a href=\"http:\/\/planetorbitrap.com\/orbitrap-velos-pro#.VkDviNWrSJc\" target=\"_blank\">Orbitrap Velos<\/a>&nbsp;mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific) working in the regime of a data-dependent MS to MS\/MS. The team also measured tree growth, the mycorrhizae, the chlorophyll concentration, and the amount of soluble carbohydrates and starch.<\/p>\n<p><span>In the forest, researchers found P. ER and P. VF trees were taller. P. ER saplings showed lower diameter at breast height (DBH) values, while P. VF did not differ in DBH between plots.&nbsp;<\/span>In the grassland, the team observed losses among P. VF trees as a result of an infestation from the small poplar borer <em>(Saperda populnea L.<\/em>).Trees grown in grassland also had a decreased mycorrhization frequency.<\/p>\n<p>Looking at the protein content, the majority of proteomes (with the exception of P. ER leaf proteomes) in both environments had increased abundance of stress response proteins connected with plant defense. In P. ER leaf proteomes, the most representative group was carbon fixation, which was mainly a consequence of the high percentage of these proteins in the grassland protein profile. The forest environment also had a large number of proteins connected to protein transport and proteolysis.<\/p>\n<p>The researchers note that many challenges exist in field studies. For example, it can be near impossible to eliminate variables in setting up the experiment. Despite these challenges, the researchers maintain that proteomics is a valuable tool for plant environmental studies.<\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><strong>Reference<\/strong><\/p>\n<p><span>1. Szuba A, et al. (2015) &ldquo;Utilization of proteomics in experimental field conditions &#8211; A case study of poplars growing on grassland affected by long-term starch wastewater irrigation,&rdquo; Journal of Proteomics, 3(126) (pp. 200&ndash;17), doi: 10.1016\/j.jprot.2015.06.002.&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span>&nbsp;<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Poplar trees are a valuable model system for studying changes in biomass. Recently, Szuba et al. published the results of a proteomics workflow for investigating differences in poplars growing on separate plots.1 The team wanted to determine if there were any differences in growth or any evidence of stress when they grew poplars in grassland<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":13,"featured_media":7644,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_genesis_hide_title":false,"_genesis_hide_breadcrumbs":false,"_genesis_hide_singular_image":false,"_genesis_hide_footer_widgets":false,"_genesis_custom_body_class":"","_genesis_custom_post_class":"","_genesis_layout":"","_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[24],"tags":[823],"division":[],"class_list":{"0":"post-7620","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-non-human-proteomics","8":"tag-environmental-studies","9":"entry"},"_selected_authors":"","_selected_reviewers":"","acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO Premium plugin v27.8 (Yoast SEO v27.8) - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-premium-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Recently, Szuba et al. published the results of a proteomics workflow for or investigating differences in poplars growing on separate plots.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Recently, Szuba et al. published the results of a proteomics workflow for or investigating differences in poplars growing on separate plots.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Accelerating Proteomics\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/thermofisher\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2016-02-12T12:00:54+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2016-04-29T16:53:02+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2016\/02\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"500\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"334\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Emily Humphreys\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:creator\" content=\"@thermofisher\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:site\" content=\"@thermofisher\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Emily Humphreys\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Emily Humphreys\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d44674a977ab12b9f2506bec3843973b\"},\"headline\":\"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-12T12:00:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-29T16:53:02+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":543,\"commentCount\":0,\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2016\\\/02\\\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"environmental studies\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Non-Human Proteomics\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/\",\"name\":\"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2016\\\/02\\\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2016-02-12T12:00:54+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2016-04-29T16:53:02+00:00\",\"author\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d44674a977ab12b9f2506bec3843973b\"},\"description\":\"Recently, Szuba et al. published the results of a proteomics workflow for or investigating differences in poplars growing on separate plots.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2016\\\/02\\\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/sites\\\/2\\\/2016\\\/02\\\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg\",\"width\":500,\"height\":334,\"caption\":\"Two poplar tree. Image: TatyanaKokoulina\\\/Shutterstock.com\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.thermofisher.com\\\/blog\\\/proteomics\\\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/\",\"name\":\"Accelerating Proteomics\",\"description\":\"\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/proteomics\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/d44674a977ab12b9f2506bec3843973b\",\"name\":\"Emily Humphreys\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/878cbec1206c605e58941f79404bd506da2c188f011046a339d0b069c1c97d0d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/878cbec1206c605e58941f79404bd506da2c188f011046a339d0b069c1c97d0d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/878cbec1206c605e58941f79404bd506da2c188f011046a339d0b069c1c97d0d?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Emily Humphreys\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\\\/author\\\/emilyhumphreys\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO Premium plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies","description":"Recently, Szuba et al. published the results of a proteomics workflow for or investigating differences in poplars growing on separate plots.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies","og_description":"Recently, Szuba et al. published the results of a proteomics workflow for or investigating differences in poplars growing on separate plots.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/","og_site_name":"Accelerating Proteomics","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/thermofisher","article_published_time":"2016-02-12T12:00:54+00:00","article_modified_time":"2016-04-29T16:53:02+00:00","og_image":[{"width":500,"height":334,"url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2016\/02\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Emily Humphreys","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_creator":"@thermofisher","twitter_site":"@thermofisher","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Emily Humphreys","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/"},"author":{"name":"Emily Humphreys","@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#\/schema\/person\/d44674a977ab12b9f2506bec3843973b"},"headline":"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies","datePublished":"2016-02-12T12:00:54+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-29T16:53:02+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/"},"wordCount":543,"commentCount":0,"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2016\/02\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg","keywords":["environmental studies"],"articleSection":["Non-Human Proteomics"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/","url":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/","name":"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2016\/02\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg","datePublished":"2016-02-12T12:00:54+00:00","dateModified":"2016-04-29T16:53:02+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#\/schema\/person\/d44674a977ab12b9f2506bec3843973b"},"description":"Recently, Szuba et al. published the results of a proteomics workflow for or investigating differences in poplars growing on separate plots.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2016\/02\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2016\/02\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg","width":500,"height":334,"caption":"Two poplar tree. Image: TatyanaKokoulina\/Shutterstock.com"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/proteomics-in-environmental-field-studies\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Proteomics in Environmental Field Studies"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#website","url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/","name":"Accelerating Proteomics","description":"","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/#\/schema\/person\/d44674a977ab12b9f2506bec3843973b","name":"Emily Humphreys","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/878cbec1206c605e58941f79404bd506da2c188f011046a339d0b069c1c97d0d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/878cbec1206c605e58941f79404bd506da2c188f011046a339d0b069c1c97d0d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/878cbec1206c605e58941f79404bd506da2c188f011046a339d0b069c1c97d0d?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Emily Humphreys"},"url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/author\/emilyhumphreys\/"}]}},"jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_featured_media_url":"https:\/\/admin.acceleratingscience.com\/proteomics\/wp-content\/uploads\/sites\/2\/2016\/02\/shutterstock_3023382531.jpg","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7620","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/13"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7620"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7620\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7644"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7620"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7620"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7620"},{"taxonomy":"division","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.thermofisher.com\/blog\/proteomics\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/division?post=7620"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}