Search
Search
View additional product information for Flp-In™ T-REx™ Core Kit - FAQs (K650001)
14 product FAQs found
We have observed in-house that in cells where the FRT site has integrated into a very transcriptionally active locus in the host cell genome (seen more commonly in Flp-In CHO and Flp-In 293 cells but can also happen in Flp-In 3T3 cells and any other Flp-In host cell line), there is some "read-through" transcription and translation of the lacZ-Zeocin ORF subsequent to the Flp-In reaction, even though the lacZ-Zeocin ORF does not have a bonafide promoter and ATG. In such cases, the hygromycin-resistant clones would also be lacZ-positive and Zeocin antibiotic-resistant. To make sure that the integration is FRT site-specific and not random, we recommend doing a parallel control transfection with no pOG44 present. This should yield no surviving clones upon hygromycin selection, indicating that all the hygromycin-resistant clones obtained in the presence of pOG44 are indeed Flp recombinase-dependent and hence have the gene of interest integrated at the FRT site. Also, a Southern blot analysis of these clones will help verify that they do indeed have proper FRT integration of the gene of interest despite the expression of lacZ (although this is typically not necessary). After the Flp-In reaction, as long as you see hygromycin-resistant clones, we recommend that you select them and assay them for expression of your gene of interest.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Expression Support Center.
The Flp-In 3T3 cell line is derived from NIH3T3 cells, which are mouse fibroblast cells. The CMV promoter is known to get silenced over time in murine cell lines and hence we would recommend using a Flp-In expression vector with a non-CMV promoter in these cells, such as the pEF5/FRT/V5-D-TOPO vector or the pEF5/FRT/V5-DEST vector.
Before giving up, we would suggest that you try using the pFRT/lacZeo2 vector to generate your host cell line. This vector contains a truncated version of the SV40 promoter driving the lacZ-Zeocin fusion. Use of this vector facilitates the isolation of clones that have integrated the vector near enhancer elements in the genome, thus resulting in higher levels of expression of the gene of interest.
The Jump-In system is PhiC31-integrase mediated and is a stable, targeted, and irreversible mammalian expression system. It consists of the Jump-In Fast system that involves a single integration step and the Jump-InTI (targeted integration) system that needs two integration steps, both of which are targeted and irreversible. In contrast, the Flp-In system is a stable, targeted mammalian expression system that is reversible. The first integration is random (integration of pFRT/lacZeo), and the second integration (integration of the Flp-In expression vector) is targeted but reversible.
In theory, one can get multiple integrations of the Flp-In expression construct—an FRT-specific integration event and a random, second-site integration. However, random integration is a relatively uncommon event. Limiting the amount of DNA in the transfection will reduce the chance of second-site integration. We have transfected 293 cells (lacking the FRT site) with the pcDNA5/FRT vector and have identified one potential second-site integrant after screening over 200 clones. DNA integrations can be detected by Southern blot. A single integrant will display a single band; double: two; triple: three, etc. We have maintained a number of Flp-In expression cell lines for over four months and have not observed any loss of the Flp-In expression construct, whether hygromycin selection was maintained or not.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Expression Support Center.
When a co-transfection is performed, there is no way of testing the double stable cell line for functional TetR or GeneSwitch protein, respectively. On the other hand, when sequential transfection is performed, one can functionally test the generated T-REx or GeneSwitch cell line by transiently transfecting the lacZ expression control plasmid and then picking a clone that shows the lowest basal level of expression of lacZ in the absence of the inducer, and the highest level of lacZ in the presence of the inducer. This clone can then be expanded and used to transfect the T-REx or GeneSwitch expression construct, as the case may be.
With the GeneSwitch system, it is possible to have the absolute lowest basal levels of expression of the gene of interest, whereas the T-REx system may be a little leaky due to the inevitable presence of tetracycline in FBS. The induced level of expression in the GeneSwitch system can be even higher than that seen with the CMV promoter. The disadvantage of the GeneSwitch system is that the expression does not appear to switch off very easily in culture, although it has been demonstrated to function beautifully in transgenics. The T-REx system, on the other hand, can be switched on and off by the addition and removal of the inducer.
The Flp-In T-REx system combines the targeted integration offered by the Flp-In system with the powerful inducible expression offered by the T-REx system. It allows generation of isogenic, inducible, stable cell lines and permits polyclonal selection of these cell lines. Once the Flp-In T-REx host cell line containing an integrated FRT site has been created, subsequent generation of Flp-In T-REx cell lines expressing the gene(s) of interest is rapid and efficient.
Doxycycline may be used as an alternative inducing agent in the T-REx system. It is similar to tetracycline in its mechanism of action, and exhibits similar dose-response and induction characteristics as tetracycline in the T-REx system. Doxycycline has been shown to have a longer half-life than tetracycline (48 hours vs. 24 hours, respectively). We do not offer doxycycline, but it may be obtained from Sigma (Cat. No. D9891).
We offer three unique mammalian expression systems for inducible/regulated expression of the gene of interest:
- T-REx system
- Flp-In T-REx system
- GeneSwitch system
Please see below to see how they compare with one another:
System -- Basal Expression Level -- Induced Expression Level -- Response time to Maximal Expression -- Transgenic Appliation
T-Rex system -- Low -- Highest -- High -- Suitable
Flp-In T-REx system -- Lower -- High -- 24-48 hrs -- Suitable
GeneSwitch system -- Lowest -- High -- 24-48 hrs -- Suitable
Use irreversible integration (Jump-In system) if the transgene should be sustained in the mammalian genome for a long time. Use reversible integration such as Flp-In system if the transgene needs to be replaced with another gene of interest after a short period of time.
The Jump-In system is PhiC31-integrase mediated and is a stable, targeted, and irreversible mammalian expression system, involving one integration step. The Jump-In TI (Targeted Integration) system needs two integration steps, both of which are targeted and irreversible. In contrast, the Flp-In system is a stable, targeted mammalian expression system that is reversible. The first integration is random (integration of pFRT/lacZeo) and the second integration (integration of the Flp-In expression vector) is targeted but reversible.
We have observed in-house that in cells where the FRT site has integrated into a very transcriptionally active locus in the host cell genome (seen more commonly in Flp-In CHO and Flp-In 293 cells but can also happen in Flp-In 3T3 cells and any other Flp-In host cell line), there is some "read-through" transcription and translation of the lacZ-Zeocin ORF post Flp-In recombination, even though the lacZ-Zeocin ORF does not have a bona fide promoter and ATG. In such cases, the hygromycin-resistant clones would also be lacZ positive and Zeocinantibiotic-resistant. To make sure that the integration is FRT site-specific and not random, we recommend doing a parallel control transfection with no pOG44 present. This should yield no surviving clones upon hygromycin selection, indicating that all the hygromycin-resistant clones obtained in the presence of pOG44 are indeed Flp recombinase-dependent and hence have the gene of interest integrated at the FRT site. Also, a Southern blot analysis of these clones will help verify that they do indeed have proper FRT integration of the gene of interest despite the expression of lacZ (although this is typically not necessary). Post Flp-Inrecombination, as long as you see hygromycin-resistant clones, we recommend that you select them and assay them for expression of your gene of interest.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Expression Support Center.
No. The two systems are not compatible since they utilize different strategies for promoter regulation. The T-REx system is designed such that native E. coli tet-repressor protein molecules bind to specific tet-operator sequences (2X TO) just downstream of the TATA box in the full length CMV promoter in the expression vector. This binding keeps the promoter silent simply by preventing the normal transcription machinery from productive assembly at the TATA box. Incidentally, it is this full length CMV promoter region that permits higher induced expression levels relative to other systems.
The recombinant 'repressor' proteins utilized in Clontech's system are actually recombinant fusion proteins which also contain a potent transcriptional transactivator. The Clontech system places operator sequences 5' to the TATA box and relies upon the VP16 transactivator to promote transcription. These repressor-transactivator fusion constructs would have unpredictable and unreliable effects at the CMV promoter in our expression constructs. Additionally, the tet-repressor protein produced from the pCDNA6/TR construct in the T-REx system has no transactivation domain and so would exert little regulatory effect at the minimal promoter region (non-full length CMV) found in the Clontech response plasmids.