Documents & Support

1 - 10 of 10 results

What are the differences in Biosafety Levels (BSL) 1 through 4? Product FAQ

Answer

The regulations and recommendations for biosafety in the United States are contained in the document Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, prepared by the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and the National Institutes of Health (NIH), and published by the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. The document defines four ascending levels of containment, referred to as biosafety levels 1 through 4, and describes the microbiological practices, safety equipment, and facility safeguards for the corresponding level of risk associated with handling a particular agent.

- Biosafety Level 1 (BSL-1): BSL-1 is the basic level of protection common to most research and clinical laboratories, and is appropriate for agents that are not known to cause disease in normal, healthy humans.
- Biosafety Level 2 (BSL-2): BSL-2 is appropriate for moderate-risk agents known to cause human disease of varying severity by ingestion or through percutaneous or mucous membrane exposure. Most cell culture labs should be at least BSL-2, but the exact requirements depend upon the cell line used and the type of work conducted.
- Biosafety Level 3 (BSL-3): BSL-3 is appropriate for indigenous or exotic agents with a known potential for aerosol transmission, and for agents that may cause serious and potentially lethal infections.
Biosafety Level 4 (BSL-4): BSL-4 is appropriate for exotic agents that pose a high individual risk of life-threatening disease by infectious aerosols and for which no treatment is available. These agents are restricted to high containment laboratories.

For more information about the biosafety level guidelines, refer to Biosafety in Microbiological and Biomedical Laboratories, 5th Edition, which is available for download at http://www.cdc.gov/biosafety/publications/bmbl5/index.htm.

Answer Id:: E11827

Was this answer helpful?

Yes No

Thank you for your response

Mycoplasma contamination in human leukemia cell lines. I. Comparison of various detection methods. Citations & References

  • Authors: Uphoff CC, Gignac SM, Drexler HG
  • Journal: J Immunol Methods
  • PubMed ID: 1374779

Effect of gamma irradiation on viability and DNA of Staphylococcus epidermidis and Escherichia coli. Citations & References

  • Authors: Trampuz A; Piper KE; Steckelberg JM; Patel R
  • Journal: Journal of Medical Microbiology
Catalog #

High efficiency application of a mate-paired library from next-generation sequencing to postlight sequencing: Corynebacterium pseudotuberculosis as a case study for microbial de novo genome assembly. Citations & References

  • Authors: Ramos RT, Carneiro AR, de Castro Soares S, Barbosa S, Varuzza L, Orabona G, Tauch A, Azevedo V, Schneider MP, Silva A
  • Journal: J Microbiol Methods
  • PubMed ID: 23792707

Whole blood assessment of antigen specific cellular immune response by real time quantitative PCR: a versatile monitoring and discovery tool. Citations & References

  • Authors: Schultz-Thater E, Frey DM, Margelli D, Raafat N, Feder-Mengus C, Spagnoli GC, Zajac P
  • Journal: J Transl Med
  • PubMed ID: 18925935

Contaminated Product Water as the Source of Phialemonium curvatum Bloodstream Infection among Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis Citations & References

  • Authors: Rao, CY; Pachucki, C; Cali, S; Santhiraj, M; Krankoski, KLK; Noble-Wang, JA; Leehey, D; Popli, S; Brandt, ME; Lindsley, MD; Fridkin, SK; Arduino, MJ
  • Journal: INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY

cDNA Library Construction Experiment Protocol

spinner