Analyzing Trace Elements With EPA Method 200.8

ICP-MS analysis of metal contaminants in drinking water

US EPA Method 200.8 is the "Determination of Trace Elements in Waters and Wastes by Inductively Coupled Plasma - Mass Spectrometry (ICP-MS)." This method is for analysis of 21 trace metal elements in drinking, surface, and ground waters, and can also be used for solid waste samples.

21 Trace Analytes Measured by EPA 200.8 Matrix
  • Aluminum (Al)
  • Antimony (Sb)
  • Arsenic (As)
  • Barium (Ba)
  • Beryllium (Be)
  • Cadmium (Cd)
  • Chromium (Cr)
  • Cobalt (Co)
  • Copper (Cu)
  • Lead (Pb)
  • Manganese (Mn) Mercury (Hg)
  • Molybdenum (Mo)
  • Nickel (Ni)
  • Selenium (Se)
  • Silver (Ag)
  • Thallium (Tl)
  • Thorium (Th)
  • Uranium (U)
  • Vanadium (V)
  • Zinc (Zn)
  • Drinking water
  • Surface water
  • Groundwater
  • Soil
  • Sediment
  • Solid waste

Which EPA Method to use for trace metal analysis

Drinking water quality is strictly regulated by the EPA regulatory standards under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). Among the more than 90 contaminants currently regulated, 17 of them are metals or metalloid. US EPA Methods 200.5 (ICP-OES), 200.7 (ICP-OES), 200.8 (ICP-MS), and 200.9 (GFAA) are all approved methods for metal element analysis.

In recent years, EPA Method 200.8 has increased in popularity because regulatory requirements in drinking water have become strict, requiring lower level detection. Because ICP-MS detection limits can be as low as ppt (pg/L)—1000-fold lower than ICP-OES—all of the most toxic metals  in drinking water can be measured by ICP-MS using EPA Method 200.8 and meet the low ppb regulatory requirement.

EPA 200.8 is approved for use with drinking water, wastewater, ground water, and even solid samples (soil, sediment, and solid waste), despite the fact that EPA Method 6020 is a specifically approved method for the determination of trace elements in solid samples.


Strategies for improving productivity using EPA Method 200.8

  1. Use instruments capable of automation dilution and re-analysis
    ICP-MS has much lower tolerance for high total dissolved solids (TDS) compared to ICP-OES. ICP-MS analysis on samples containing heavy matrices such as wastewater can therefore result in reduced internal standard recoveries. This requires the need to manually scan for results outside the acceptable recovery range, and then manually diluting and re-analyzing the sample. Instruments with automated dilution can improve productivity by automatically identifying outliers and subsequently performing dilution and re-analysis. This automation will speed up the entire process, especially in high throughput labs where a large number of samples are analyzed daily.
  2. Use instruments that reduce impact of high sample matrix
    Regular maintenance to clean the sample introduction system—in particular sampler and skimmer cones—is necessary to reduce signal drifts and prevent plasma shutdown. If an instrument has an option to reduce the impact of high sample matrix, it will reduce the maintenance work load and increase uptime. For example, different skimmer cone inserts with different thickness can be chosen for different sample processing based on the balance of sensitivity and high matrix tolerance.
  3. Make sure your plasma cones are easy to clean
    Even in instruments with a low maintenance design, it is still necessary to clean plasma cones. It is always preferable to have an instrument with plasma cones that are easy to clean and does not require a special service call.

Use of EPA Method 200.8 for Clean Water Act and SW846

The primary use of US EPA Method 200.8 is for compliance monitoring of drinking water and wastewater. At the time of the method was approved (1994), collision cell technology was not yet available. When the technology became available in 2006, the EPA Office of Water published a memo prohibiting use of collision cell technology for drinking water analysis. However, EPA Method 200.8 has been approved for the Clean Water Act and solid waste (SW846) samples using collision cell technology. EPA is currently working with multiple organizations on update of EPA Method 200.8 that allows the use of collision cell for drinking water.


EPA Method 6020B and EPA Method 200.8

US EPA Method 6020B, finalized in 2014 with Update V, measures 21 metal elements. The major difference between EPA Method 200.8 and EPA Method 6020B is that the mineral elements such as sodium, potassium, iron, magnesium, and calcium are not included in EPA Method 200.8 but are included in EPA Method 6020B. However, the biggest difference is the use of these two methods. As described above, EPA Method 200.8 is strictly used for regulatory monitoring of drinking water and wastewater, while EPA Method 6020B is a performance-based method that can include additional elements if the performance is demonstrated. The method is for guidance, not for compliance testing. Although EPA Method 6020B does not mention collision cell technology, it is acceptable to use the technology.


Metal element monitoring in UCMR 3 and UCMR 4

Among the regulated metal contaminants measured in EPA Method 200.8, 10 elements are found on the NPDWR list and 5 on the secondary list. These contaminants are monitored through the 6-year review process for regulated contaminants. For the contaminants that are not currently on the NPDWR list, they may pose threat to human health, and are subject to monitoring in the unregulated contaminant monitoring rule (UCMR) program, which runs every five years. Chromium, strontium, cobalt, vanadium, and molybdenum  were monitored in the recent UCMR 3  using EPA200.8, or ASTMD5673-10, or SM3125. Again, for the monitoring of these metal elements in UCMR 3, collision cell technology is not allowed for ICP-MS testing with EPA 200.8. As a result,  strontium was preliminarily approved for regulation.

Germanium and manganese are on the upcoming UCMR 4  list and will be monitored between 2018 and 2020. While they are the UCMR list, these metals would be closely monitored by the public drinking water systems and data on occurrence and level of frequency would be collected during the study for further evaluation together with the health effect data before EPA makes any regulatory determinations.


UX DATA-TRKR : Contact Global UX for removal