Thermo Fisher Scientific

Your educational resource for biopharma, pharma, environmental, food and agriculture, industrial, and clinical labs

  • Categories
    • Advancing Materials
    • Advancing Mining
    • AnalyteGuru
    • Analyzing Metals
    • Ask a Scientist
    • Behind the Bench
    • Biotech at Scale
    • Clinical Conversations
    • Examining Food
    • Identifying Threats
    • Illuminating Semiconductors
    • Life in Atomic Resolution
    • Life in the Lab
    • OEMpowered
    • The Connected Lab
  • About Us
  • Contact
Accelerating ScienceAnalyteGuru / HPLC / Why Instrument Price Should Not Drive Purchase Decisions

Why Instrument Price Should Not Drive Purchase Decisions

By Dr. Timothy Cross, Dr. Timothy Cross, Senior Manager, Regional Marketing - EMEA, Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry, Thermo Fisher Scientific 06.11.2019

As a marketer, price is a common topic I come across; I guess that is why it’s one of the marketing 4Ps! However, whilst it is important, in this article I want to discuss why it shouldn’t be the main driver in purchase decisions because a focus on the initial price is often misleading and ends up costing more in the long run; and as the saying goes “you get what you pay for.”

To begin with, I will admit that I like a bargain and I don’t wish to pay over the odds for something if it doesn’t represent good value. There are some things that I don’t think are worth paying extra for, such as perfect looking fruit and vegetables; the perfect, uniformly-shaped potatoes still taste the same as the misshaped ones, so why pay more?However, it’s when things get a little more complex and the extra price offers you increased value that you have to consider whether the extra initial investment offers additional benefits. I will illustrate with a cautionary tale from my own mistake. I have a reasonably sized (and odd shaped and different levels) lawn at home. I had a great lawnmower, but after 10+ years of hard labour, it broke.

When researching a replacement, I found out there were many options and many different price points, so what did I do? I bought one at the cheaper end, of course! My lawn cutting subsequently went from under one hour to nearly two hours and my frustration levels increased substantially. Thankfully, it recently broke (after only 2.5 years) and this time I spent more on a replacement as I realised my savings of £100 had actually cost me about 100 hours of my time, immense frustration and put me back in the same position of having to buy a new lawnmower.

Initial Price vs. Lifetime Cost

As my cautionary tale illustrates, the focus on getting the best price often backfires, but as behavioural economics teaches us, we are biased to focus on that initial up-front price and forgo bigger savings over the long term for a small saving now. However, our thoughts should be on the lifetime cost of the purchase, as this can quickly alleviate the initial higher purchase price. When it comes to analytical instruments, I see three main drivers to lifetime costs:

    1. Throughput — The higher the throughput, then the more samples you can analyse and the more you can maximise the initial instrument purchase which equate to a lower cost per sample and more samples per instrument / investment.
    1. Ease-of-use — Potentially the biggest area for lifetime savings. If the instrument is easy to use then operation is streamlined and faster, training of new operators is minimized and establishment or transfer of new methods can be accomplished quickly €“ and time is money.
    1. Reliability — Obviously if your instrument is unreliable, involving frequent periods of inactivity and repeated service interventions then this adds to increased lifetime costs and wasted time.

All of these lifetime costs can quickly add up, so if they can be minimized by a slightly higher initial purchase price then, overall, the savings will be larger. Here is an example: Let’s say you buy a HPLC instrument which costs $10,000 more. You will replace this instrument in 10 years’ time, so that’s $1,000 a year. The operator costs you $150 an hour, so if that instrument can save you just seven hours of time per year then the initial higher purchase price is justified. Just a small increase in throughput, ease-of-use and/or reliability can easily save you more than seven hours per year.

In summary, the next time you consider buying a new analytical instrument, try not to focus on the initial price, but consider the lifetime cost of that instrument and whether that higher price offers benefits in terms of ease-of-use or reliability, for example, which more than compensates that initial outlay. Remember also, that you get what you pay for and trust me, after the lawnmower incident, I know!

Additional resources

    • Thinking of purchasing a new HPLC instrument? Then try this HPLC cost of ownership calculator to see how much the instrument is likely to cost and operate.
    • Ion Chromatography Cost Savings Calculator – Discover the lowest total cost of ownership with Thermo Scientific„¢ Ion Chromatography and Sample Preparation instruments.
    • If the initial purchase price is still a barrier to a new instrument, then visit our Financing and Leasing Services webpage for options on your purchase.
Elevate Your HPLC Performance with a Modern CDS

Elevate Your HPLC Performance with a Modern CDS

You may have the best HPLC system on the market, but to maxi...

Read More
Vanquish CAD P Series blog cover image

Episode 4: Introducing a More Confident Era in HPLC-CAD Analysis

The first Charged Aerosol Detector (launched in 2005) set ne...

Read More
ACT platinum cover image

A Greener HPLC Guide: How ACT Labels Help Promote Lab Sustainability

Labs use up to 10 times more energy than offices. Here’s h...

Read More
The Benefits of Charged Aerosol Detection (CAD) in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

Episode 1: The Benefits of Charged Aerosol Detection (CAD) in High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC)

High-Performance Liquid Chromatography (HPLC) is a cornersto...

Read More

Dr. Timothy Cross

Dr. Timothy Cross is a Senior Manager of Regional Marketing in EMEA for the Chromatography and Mass Spectrometry division at Thermo Fisher Scientific. He holds a Ph.D. and M.Sc. in Immunology and a B.Sc. in Biological Sciences, with professional experience in proteomics R&D before embarking on a career in marketing. He has over 20 years’ experience in both life and analytical science marketing management across a broad range of channels. He is passionate with writing about science to make it accessible to all and offering educational content to help scientists make informed decisions. In his spare time, Tim is a (very) keen runner and with a background in immunology is fascinated with how exercise impacts the immune system.
ICP MS Its Time for an Upgrade
Food Allergen Detection in Complex Matrices Utilizing the Power

Privacy StatementTerms & ConditionsLocationsSitemap

© 2025 Thermo Fisher Scientific. All Rights Reserved.

Talk to us