Spatial Omics Meets Neuroscience: Dual ISH-IHC Brain Mapping Case Study

Spatial Biology Meets Neuroscience: Dual ISH-IHC Brain Mapping

Spatial omics biology is reshaping how researchers study complex tissues by preserving the molecular context that traditional methods often lose.

For scientists pushing toward true spatial multi-omics, integrating immunohistochemistry (IHC) with in situ hybridization (ISH) represents both an opportunity and a technical challenge.

This blog explores a recent application note that demonstrates how careful protocol modifications unlock dual RNA–protein detection in the same tissue section—showing what’s possible when spatial biology moves from theory to practice.

What is spatial biology and multi-omics?

Spatial biology represents a significant advancement in our understanding of biological systems.

Many molecular analysis techniques strip away one crucial piece of information: spatial context. That is, where molecules sit and how they interact in the wider tissue environment.

Spatial biology preserves this key context. Rather than grinding up tissue samples and losing all positional data, researchers using spatial biology techniques can maintain the structural integrity of specimens. This allows them to visualize and quantify proteins, RNA, and other biomolecules exactly where cells produce and use them.

For neuroscientists studying brain architecture, this spatial context makes all the difference between understanding isolated molecular events and grasping how those events coordinate across complex neural networks.

What is spatial proteomics?

Proteomics aims to identify, characterize and quantify all proteins (the proteome) in a given system like a cell, tissue, or organism.

Unlike the relatively static genome, the proteome is highly dynamic.  Proteins change in their abundance, structure, post-translational modification profile, and environmental response all the time. Proteomic approaches can help researchers bridge the gap between genotype and phenotype to better understand cellular function, disease mechanisms, biomarkers, and more.

Traditional proteomics workflows involve extracting proteins from homogenized tissue samples. While this approach can help identify and quantify proteins with high precision, it destroys valuable spatial information about protein localization patterns.

Spatial proteomics considers protein distribution, abundance, and interaction within the natural tissue environment. Instead of asking simply, “what proteins are present,” spatial proteomics asks, “where are these proteins located, and what does that tell us about cellular function?”

What is spatial transcriptomics?

Transcriptomics is the study of the transcriptome, or the complete set of RNA transcripts in a system.

Spatial transcriptomics approaches can reveal how gene expression varies across different regions of a tissue sample, providing insights into cellular heterogeneity and tissue architecture that would be lost in conventional bulk RNA sequencing methods.

Spatial transcriptomics might look like a researcher working with brain tissue and identifying region-specific gene expression patterns that are associated with neural function, development, or pathology.

What is spatial multi-omics?

Spatial multi-omics adds yet another layer of contextualization to our biological understanding by combining multiple spatial “omics” datasets – including spatial transcriptomics and proteomics.

For example, combining spatial transcriptomics with spatial proteomics allows researchers to correlate gene expression patterns with protein abundance and localization in the same tissue section.

Spatial multi-omics is particularly valuable for understanding complex biological systems like the brain, where cellular heterogeneity and regional specialization play crucial roles in function. By simultaneously mapping multiple molecular features across tissue sections, researchers can identify coordinated changes in gene expression and protein abundance that may drive normal development or contribute to disease pathology.

Getting multi-omics right with multiplexing 

Combining spatial proteomics with transcriptomics sounds straightforward in theory. The reality proves more challenging.

To understand why requires a deep dive into two key methods: immunohistochemistry (IHC) and in situ hybridization (ISH).

IHC vs ISH: Different targets, different chemistry

Immunohistochemistry (IHC) uses antibodies that bind specifically to protein targets within tissue sections. You can label these antibodies with fluorophores for direct visualization or with enzymes that generate colorimetric signals. After decades of refinement by researchers, IHC offers reliable protein localization through well-validated antibodies.

In situ hybridization (ISH) takes a different approach, detecting RNA through complementary probes that hybridize to target sequences. When pairs of probes bind in close proximity along the RNA, they create a structure that serves as the foundation for branched DNA amplification. Successive layers of amplifiers and labeled probes build on this scaffold, producing a strong signal with minimal background. This approach enables highly sensitive detection, often at the single-molecule level, while preserving spatial context.

In short: IHC reveals the final protein products of gene expression, while ISH captures the intermediate mRNA transcripts.

Combining IHC and ISH

Successful integration of immunohistochemistry (IHC) with in situ hybridization (ISH) requires confronting a fundamental conflict: optimal conditions for each technique directly oppose each other. IHC antibodies degrade during the protease treatments that ISH requires, while the RNases present during IHC protocols destroy RNA targets needed for ISH detection.

Recent studies have identified specific protocol modifications that address these competing demands. Tissues need to be pretreated with RNase inhibitors before and during IHC labeling to protect RNA integrity. Following IHC labeling, antibodies require crosslinking to the tissue—standard formaldehyde fixation alone cannot withstand the harsh protease treatments necessary for ISH protocols. When executed properly, these modifications enable robust dual detection of both protein and mRNA targets in the same tissue section.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC)In Situ Hybridization (ISH)
What it detects: Proteins (antigens)

How it works: Antibodies tagged with
fluorophores or enzymes bind to target proteins

Output: Fluorescent or chromogenic protein localization

Spatial analysis application: Defining cell neighborhoods and tissue architecture
What it detects: RNA transcripts (mRNA, miRNA)

How it works: Nucleic acid probes hybridize to target RNA; amplified via branched DNA systems
Output: Fluorescent or chromogenic transcript localization

Spatial analysis application: Revealing active transcriptional states and cell heterogeneity

⚠️ Note: Combining IHC and ISH in the same sample introduces cross-interference.

  • Protease digestion during ISH can destroy antibody epitopes (IHC signal loss).
  • Antibody reagents can introduce RNases that degrade RNA (ISH signal loss).
  • Multiplex workflows must include RNase inhibition and antibody crosslinking to preserve both signals.

Spatial multi-omics in action: brain mapping in mice

Thermo Fisher Scientific R&D experts recently tackled the challenge of dual IHC-ISH for spatial biology analysis.

Their approach, outlined in full in a digital application note, introduces a practical workflow for multiplexing IHC and ISH in mouse brain tissue using Invitrogen™ ViewRNA™ Tissue Assay Kits (fluorescence or colorimetric) alongside antibody-based IHC labeling.


This note (.pdf) addresses the challenges of integrating spatial proteomics and transcriptomics with a neuroscience focus. Through a combination of RNA ISH and IHC techniques, these adapted protocols demonstrates multiplex spatial omics on mouse brain sections.


Approach

To overcome ISH and IHC standard protocol incompatibilities, our experts implemented two critical modifications:

For RNA detection, they applied branched-DNA ISH probes (ViewRNA ISH kits) capable of resolving up to four mRNA targets simultaneously, using either fluorescent readouts (Invitrogen™ Alexa Fluor™ dyes) or enzymatic colorimetric detection (Fast Red, Fast Blue, DAB).

For protein detection, they used spectrally distinct antibodies, either pre-conjugated off-the-shelf or prepared in-house with theInvitrogen™ ReadyLabel™ Antibody Labeling Kits. They also carefully designed panels to minimize spectral overlap and reduce autofluorescence, particularly in green emission channels.

The team also prepared both cryopreserved and FFPE brain tissue, balancing the higher RNA integrity of cryosections against the lower RNase activity in FFPE samples. They then imaged samples across multiple platforms, ranging from widefield systems to a spectral imaging instrument that resolves up to nine fluorophores simultaneously.

👉 Figure 1 shows why these workflow modifications are essential: with RNase inhibition, RNA and protein signals remain intact; without it, RNA signals nearly disappear despite strong antibody labeling.

Results

The team’s optimized protocol helped retain both RNA and protein signals in multiplex assays, successfully demonstrating that ISH and IHC can coexist in the same tissue section.

The end result was high-content spatial analysis without specialized equipment:

  • High-plex IHC: They generated an 8+1 antibody panel in mouse brain using iterative labeling with amplification reagents.
  • RNA detection: They simultaneously visualized four mRNA targets (Gad2, Ppib, Polr2a, Gapdh) with high sensitivity in both cryopreserved and FFPE tissue.
  • Colorimetric ISH: DAB substrates provided stable brightfield signals with faster development times, enabling archiving without loss of image quality.
  • Dual ISH + IHC: They preserved GFAP and HuC/HuD protein signals while detecting Gad2 and Ppib RNA, revealing intricate neuronal patterns in hippocampal regions.

👉 Figure 2 highlights the outcome: a multiplexed hippocampal section that maps both RNA and protein markers in situ, capturing the spatial complexity of neuronal populations.

Spatial biology and multi-omics technologies

While specialized equipment is not always necessary for advanced analysis in spatial biology, a strong collection of core multipurpose instruments can move the needle across the board.

Imaging platforms

Imaging platforms play a central role in multiplex workflows, since accurate signal detection depends on both sensitivity and spectral resolution. Systems capable of spectral unmixing and multi-channel acquisition allow researchers to visualize numerous RNA and protein targets simultaneously, while also offering flexibility for brightfield or fluorescence readouts depending on the assay design.

Platforms range from versatile systems like the Invitrogen™ EVOS™ M5000 to specialized instruments such as the Invitrogen™ EVOS™ S1000 Spatial Imaging System, which can simultaneously resolve nine fluorophores during a single acquisition with integrated spectral unmixing. The right imaging system can make or break complex spatial biology experiments.

Mountants like ProLong™ RapidSet™also play a subtle but critical role in spatial imaging. By preventing photobleaching and maintaining stable colorimetric deposits, they ensure that multiplexed ISH and IHC signals remain bright, balanced, and reliable for both immediate analysis and long-term archiving.

RNA detection

Signal amplification strategies become essential when pushing detection limits. ViewRNA assay techniques employ pairs of single-stranded DNA oligomers that hybridize to mRNA targets, forming a double-Z structure. This structure undergoes amplification through successive rounds of branched DNA oligomer hybridization under high stringency conditions, creating a substantially amplified complex with minimal background noise.

The ViewRNA assay portfolio includes both fluorescence and colorimetric detection options, with the fluorescence kit enabling simultaneous visualization of up to four RNA targets using Alexa Fluor dyes (488, 546/594, 647, and 750). Alternatively, the colorimetric kits utilize enzymatic signal amplification through alkaline phosphatase (with Fast Red or Fast Blue substrates) or horseradish peroxidase (with DAB solution).

Protein detection

For protein detection, researchers can use either directly labeled antibodies or label unconjugated antibodies using the ReadyLabel Antibody Labeling Kit. The latter approach offers flexibility when directly labeled antibodies are unavailable for specific targets.

Spatial amplification reagents like Invitrogen™ Aluora™ Spatial Amplification Reagents make it possible to detect many protein targets in the same tissue by boosting signal intensity and enabling iterative rounds of labeling. This approach not only enhances weak signals but also supports high-plex antibody panels, creating a strong foundation for combining protein and RNA detection in a single workflow.

Key takeaways

  • Dual ISH–IHC workflows can reliably preserve both RNA and protein signals. Strategic use of RNase inhibition and antibody crosslinking overcomes the incompatibilities that typically cause signal loss.
  • Multiplexing can deliver deeper biological insight. High-plex antibody panels combined with multi-target RNA assays reveal cell states, heterogeneity, and tissue interactions with greater clarity.
  • This workflow applies well beyond neuroscience. Researchers studying cancer, immunology, and aging can adapt the same approach to interrogate diverse tissue contexts.
  • Advanced spatial multi-omics does not require highly specialized systems. With optimized reagents and widely available imaging platforms, complex workflows become accessible to many labs.
  • Small protocol adjustments can enable big experimental gains. The application note demonstrates how fine-tuning established methods transforms spatial biology from incremental to integrative discovery.

More spatial biology and multi-omics resources

## 

For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.   

© 2025 Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. All rights reserved. All trademarks are the property of Thermo Fisher Scientific and its subsidiaries unless otherwise specified. 

Written by:

Dana D'Amico

Science Writer, Thermo Fisher Scientific

Dana D'Amico is an award-winning science writer with more than a decade of experience bringing research stories to life. She holds a B.S. in biology from Allegheny College and an MFA in creative nonfiction writing from the University of Minnesota.

Read more D’Amico, Dana

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Get news and research reviews on the topic of your choice, right in your inbox.

Subscribe Now

  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.