Clinicians have become increasingly aware of MGCS and their effects on patients and their quality of life

 

Examples of situations where clinicians need to be aware of the effects and the clinical relevance of monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance are described below by Dr Maximilian Steinhardt, a specialist in internal medicine, hematology, and oncology at Würzburg University Hospital, focusing on multiple myeloma and amyloidosis. To hear more of the interview* with Dr Steinhardt, please visit here: https://info.bindingsite.com/de-de/flc.spe.hcp.ger

*interview is in German


Use this interactive diagram to learn more about different monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance:


Ocular Immune System Heart & Circular System Renal Skin Skeleton Neuron

What is a Monoclonal Gammopathy of Clinical Significance?

MGCS are monoclonal gammopathies that do not meet the clinical definition of an active malignancy but where the monoclonal protein or the plasma cell clone itself causes organ damage in a manner unrelated to the tumour burden2.

It is important to monitor patients with MGUS to detect the development of MGCS early. This allows for timely treatment, effective symptom management, and an improved quality of life for the patients.

The clinical significance of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS) is not limited to progression to multiple myeloma, AL amyloidosis or another active malignancy such as Waldenström’s Macroglobulinaemia.

Life expectancy is reduced, even in patients who do not progress to an active malignancy.

Some of this reduction in life expectancy is due to monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance.

Figure 1 – Life expectancy in patients with MGUS in comparison to people without MGUS.  AAdapted from Kristinsson et al. 200934

In monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance, recognising that the monoclonal protein is the cause of the patient’s symptoms is of utmost importance.  Since the amount of monoclonal protein produced by the underlying tumour may be small, all of the guideline-recommended tests for the identification of monoclonal protein should be used. As some patients have tumours that only secrete monoclonal free light chains, sFLC testing should be included in the assessment for possible monoclonal gammopathies.

Monoclonal protein levels may change over time, so it is important to monitor the patient’s monoclonal protein. sFLC testing should also be included in this step, to monitor sFLC levels.  sFLC measurements provide additional information and may detect rises in monoclonal protein production earlier than other methods.

References

1. Steiner N, Gobel G, Suchecki P, Prokop W, Neuwirt H, Gunsilius E: Monoclonal gammopathy of renal significance (MGRS) increases the risk for progression to multiple myeloma: an observational study of 2935 MGUS patients. Oncotarget 2018, 9(2):2344-2356.

2. Bird J, Behrens J, Westin J, Turesson I, Drayson M, Beetham R, D'sa S, Soutar R, Waage A, Gulbrandsen N et al: UK Myeloma Forum (UKMF) and Nordic Myeloma Study Group (NMSG): guidelines for the investigation of newly detected M-proteins and the management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Br J Haematol 2009, 147(1):22-42.

3. Caers J, Vekemans MC, Bries G, Beel K, Delrieu V, Deweweire A, Demuynck H, De PB, De SH, Kentos A et al: Diagnosis and follow-up of monoclonal gammopathies of undetermined significance; information for referring physicians. Ann Med 2013, 45(5-6):413-422.

4. Fermand JP, Bridoux F, Dispenzieri A, Jaccard A, Kyle RA, Leung N, Merlini G: Monoclonal gammopathy of clinical significance: a novel concept with therapeutic implications. Blood 2018, 132(14):1478-1485.

5. Bida JP, Kyle RA, Therneau TM, Melton LJ, III, Plevak MF, Larson DR, Dispenzieri A, Katzmann JA, Rajkumar SV: Disease associations with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a population-based study of 17,398 patients. Mayo Clin Proc 2009, 84(8):685-693.

6. Ramchandren S, Lewis RA: An update on monoclonal gammopathy and neuropathy. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2012, 12(1):102-110.

7. Abraham A, Barnett C, Katzberg HD, Lovblom LE, Perkins BA, Bril V: High frequency of MGUS in DSP. Muscle Nerve 2018, 57(6):1018-1021.

8. Matà S, Torricelli S, Barilaro A, Grippo A, Forleo P, Del Mastio M, Sorbi S: Polyneuropathy and monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS); update of a clinical experience. J Neurol Sci 2021, 423:117335.

9. Zis P, Syrigou R, Fanouraki S, Gavriatopoulou M, Fotiou D, Theodorakakou F, Spiliopoulou V, Roussou M, Ntanasis-Stathopoulos I, Malandrakis P et al: Prevalence of Peripheral Neuropathy (PN) Among Patients with Asymptomatic Monoclonal Gammopathies: A Clinical & Electrophysiological Study. Blood 2023, 142(Supplement 1):529-529.

10. Rögnvaldsson S, Aspelund T, Thorsteinsdóttir S, Turesson I, Björkholm M, Landgren O, Yngvi Kristinsson S: Untangling fracture risk in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: A population-based cohort study. European Journal of Haematology 2021, 107(1):137-144.

11. Dispenzieri A, Kyle R, Merlini G, Miguel JS, Ludwig H, Hajek R, Palumbo A, Jagannath S, Blade J, Lonial S et al: International Myeloma Working Group guidelines for serum-free light chain analysis in multiple myeloma and related disorders. Leukemia 2009, 23(2):215-224.

12. NICE: Myeloma: diagnosis and management [NG35]. NICE Guidelines 2016.

13. Keren DF, Bocsi G, Billman BL, Etzell J, Faix JD, Kumar S, Lipe B, McCudden C, Montgomery R, Murray DL et al: Laboratory Detection and Initial Diagnosis of Monoclonal Gammopathies: Guideline From the College of American Pathologists in Collaboration With the American Association for Clinical Chemistry and the American Society for Clinical Pathology. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2021, 146(5):575-590.

14. Stern S, Chaudhuri S, Drayson M, Henshaw S, Karunanithi K, Willis F, Haemato-Oncology Task Force of the British Society for H, the UKMF: Investigation and management of the monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: A British Society for Haematology Good Practice Paper. Br J Haematol 2023, 202(4):734-744.

15. Madan S, Greipp PR: The incidental monoclonal protein: current approach to management of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS). Blood Rev 2009, 23(6):257-265.

16. Melton LJ, 3rd, Rajkumar SV, Khosla S, Achenbach SJ, Oberg AL, Kyle RA: Fracture risk in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. J Bone Miner Res 2004, 19(1):25-30.

17. Gregersen H, Jensen P, Gislum M, Jorgensen B, Sorensen HT, Norgaard M: Fracture risk in patients with monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance. Br J Haematol 2006, 135(1):62-67.

18. Berenson JR, Yellin O: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: why identification of these patients and assessment of their skeletons is important. Clin Lymphoma Myeloma 2009, 9(4):311-315.

19. Kristinsson SY, Tang M, Pfeiffer RM, Bjorkholm M, Blimark C, Mellqvist UH, Wahlin A, Turesson I, Landgren O: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of skeletal fractures: a population-based study. Blood 2010, 116(15):2651-2655.

20. Veronese N, Luchini C, Solmi M, Sergi G, Manzato E, Stubbs B: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and bone health outcomes: a systematic review and exploratory meta-analysis. Journal of Bone and Mineral Metabolism 2018, 36(1):128-132.

21. Wechalekar AD, Fontana M, Quarta CC, Liedtke M: AL Amyloidosis for Cardiologists: Awareness, Diagnosis, and Future Prospects: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review. JACC CardioOncol 2022, 4(4):427-441.

22. Srkalovic G, Cameron MG, Rybicki L, Deitcher SR, Kattke-Marchant K, Hussein MA: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma are associated with an increased incidence of venothromboembolic disease. Cancer 2004, 101(3):558-566.

23. Kristinsson SY, Pfeiffer RM, Bjorkholm M, Goldin LR, Schulman S, Blimark C, Mellqvist UH, Wahlin A, Turesson I, Landgren O: Arterial and venous thrombosis in monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and multiple myeloma: a population-based study. Blood 2010, 115(24):4991-4998.

24. Gregersen H, Norgaard M, Severinsen MT, Engebjerg MC, Jensen P, Sorensen HT: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and risk of venous thromboembolism. Eur J Haematol 2011, 86(2):129-134.

25. Rögnvaldsson S, Gasparini A, Thorsteinsdottir S, Sverrisdottir I, Eythorsson E, Long TE, Palmason R, Vidarsson B, Onundarson PT, Agnarsson BA et al: Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and the risk of thrombotic events: Results from iStopMM, a prospective population-based screening study. Br J Haematol 2024.

26. El-Khoury H, Lee DJ, Alberge JB, Redd R, Cea-Curry CJ, Perry J, Barr H, Murphy C, Sakrikar D, Barnidge D et al: Prevalence of monoclonal gammopathies and clinical outcomes in a high-risk US population screened by mass spectrometry: a multicentre cohort study. Lancet Haematol 2022, 9(5):e340-e349.

27. Garcia-Pavia P, Rapezzi C, Adler Y, Arad M, Basso C, Brucato A, Burazor I, Caforio ALP, Damy T, Eriksson U et al: Diagnosis and treatment of cardiac amyloidosis. A position statement of the European Society of Cardiology Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur J Heart Fail 2021, 23(4):512-526.

28. Stern LK, Kittleson MM: Updates in Cardiac Amyloidosis Diagnosis and Treatment. Current oncology reports 2021, 23(4):47.

29. Comenzo RL, Reece D, Palladini G, Seldin D, Sanchorawala V, Landau H, Falk R, Wells K, Solomon A, Wechalekar A et al: Consensus guidelines for the conduct and reporting of clinical trials in systemic light-chain amyloidosis. Leukemia 2012, 26(11):2317-2325.

30. Wasielica-Poslednik J, Gericke A, Munder M, Pfeiffer N, Lisch W: [Hematological diagnosis in the corneal consultation]. Ophthalmologe 2018, 115(9):765-768.

31. Lisch W, Wasielica-Poslednik J, Kivela T, Schlotzer-Schrehardt U, Rohrbach JM, Sekundo W, Pleyer U, Lisch C, Desuki A, Rossmann H et al: The Hematologic Definition of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance in Relation to Paraproteinemic Keratopathy (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis). Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2016, 114:T7.

32. Tete SM, Kipling D, Westra J, de HA, Bijl M, Dunn-Walters DK, Sahota SS, Bos NA: Monoclonal paraprotein influences baseline B-cell repertoire diversity and perturbates influenza vaccination-induced B-cell response. Exp Hematol 2015.

33. Dispenzieri A: Monoclonal gammopathies of clinical significance. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2020, 2020(1):380-388.

34. Kristinsson SY, Bjorkholm M, Andersson TML, Eloranta S, Dickman PW, Goldin LR, Blimark C, Mellqvist UH, Wahlin A, Turesson I et al: Patterns of survival and causes of death following a diagnosis of monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance: a population-based study. Haematologica 2009, 94(12):1714-1720.

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)
Clinical Applications
Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance (MGUS)

Signs, symptoms, diagnosis and monitoring.
MGUS is of clinical significance
Expert Insights
MGUS is of clinical significance

Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance is more than just a precursor to Multiple Myeloma.
Contact Us
Questions about our products or services? Our team is ready to hear them.

Complete this form and we will get back to you