Lumio™ Green In-Cell Detection Kit - FAQs

The Lumio reagent is hydrophobic and can easily pass through the membrane. There is no need to permeabilize the membrane in order to get this reagent into cells.

Serum proteins such as BSA (66 kDa) from the mammalian cell culture medium may cross-react with the Lumio reagent, producing non-specific bands. Removing the cell culture medium and washing the mammalian cells 3-4 times with PBS after harvesting the cells minimizes the non-specific binding from BSA.

We have not experienced negative effects with Lumio reagents at the concentrations used to detect protein in the cells. We also do not see any change in cell morphology when using Lumio Green. After application of the Lumio Red, we do see some minor morphological changes in the cells that are reversed after 24 hours of application of the reagent.

The advantage of Lumio staining is that one can do both in vivo and in vitro protein labeling. For in vivo labeling, load the cells with the Lumio reagent and then visualize the cells/proteins under a fluorescence microscope. This is similar to the GeneBLAzer detection procedure except that GeneBLAzer detection is based on an enzymatic reaction that amplifies the reporter signal. GFP fluorescence can only be detected within the cell (in vivo) because proper protein folding is needed. The Lumio tag is very small (6 amino acids, 585 Da), in contrast to the bla protein in GeneBLAzer detection (264 amino acids, 29 kDa) and the GFP protein (27 kDa), and therefore most likely will not interfere with the function of the protein it is fused to. GFP has the disadvantage of being a large fusion tag and is not an enzymatic-based reporter system. Unlike GeneBLAzer detection and GFP, a Lumio-tagged protein can be visualized on a gel after treating the cell lysate or protein with the Lumio reagent. Compared to Lumio and GFP, GeneBLAzer detection is a more sensitive detection method for use in live cells. Also unlike Lumio and GFP, the GeneBLAzer detection method allows for ratiometric read-outs and thus eliminates sample-to-sample variation.

We have not used Lumio reagent for in cell labeling in yeast. However the following reference has information about use of Lumio/FlAsH technology for labeling in yeast: Rice MC et al. (2001) In vitro and in vivo nucleotide exchange directed by chimeric RNA/DNA oligonucleotides in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Microbiol. 40:857–868. (Note, the article cites FlAsH reagent, which was renamed Lumio Green).
Other helpful references on use of FlAsH (Lumio) may be found in this review article: Cavagnero S, Jungbauer LM (2005) Painting protein misfolding in the cell in real time with an atomic-scale brush. Trends Biotechnol 23:157-162.

Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.

The FlAsH-EDT2 reagent has been renamed Lumio Green Labeling Reagent. It is available in the Lumio Green In-Cell Labeling Kit, Cat. No. 12589-057. While the kit is designed for staining live cells expressing proteins containing the Lumio fusion tag, you may substitute the Lumio Green labeling reagent directly into your existing protein labeling protocol. The kit contains the Lumio Green reagent and Disperse Blue 3 for background suppression. We also have available the Lumio Red In-Cell Labeling Kit, Cat. No. 12589-040.

Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our Protein Assays and Analysis Support Center.

Our vectors have not been completely sequenced. Your sequence data may differ when compared to what is provided. Known mutations that do not affect the function of the vector are annotated in public databases.

No, our vectors are not routinely sequenced. Quality control and release criteria utilize other methods.

Sequences provided for our vectors have been compiled from information in sequence databases, published sequences, and other sources.