What is the best molar ratio of PCR product:vector to use for TOPO TA cloning? Is there an equation to calculate the quantity to use?
We suggest starting with a molar ratio of 1:1 (insert:vector), with a range of 0.5:1 to 2:1. The quantity used in a TOPO cloning reaction is typically 5-10 ng of a 2 kb PCR product.
Equation:
length of insert (bp)/length of vector (bp) x ng of vector = ng of insert needed for 1:1 (insert:vector ratio)
What is the best ratio of insert:vector to use for cloning? Is there an equation to calculate this?
The optimal ratio is 1:1 insert to vector. Optimization can be done using a ratio of 0.5-2 molecules of insert for every molecule of the vector.
Equation:
length of insert (bp)/length of vector (bp) x ng of vector = ng of insert needed for 1:1 insert:vector ratio
Can I use Taq polymerase to generate my gene of interest for directional TOPO cloning?
No, your gene of interest must be amplified with a proofreading polymerase such as Platinum SuperFi DNA Polymerase or AccuPrime Pfx DNA Polymerase that leaves blunt ends for directional TOPO cloning.
What are the requirements for primer design when using directional TOPO cloning?
Please consider the following when designing your primers:
- The 3' pcr primer cannot contain homology to the 5' flap sequence GTGG.
- The enzyme you use must create a blunt-ended PCR product for cloning.
- Primers cannot contain 5' phosphates, which will block the 5' OH nucleophile reactive group.
- The reading frame must be considered when you are designing your primers.
Which PCR polymerases do you recommend for TA/Blunt/D-TOPO cloning and why?
TA Cloning:
- This cloning method was designed for use with pure Taq polymerases (native, recombinant, hot start); however, High Fidelity or Taq blends generally work well with TA cloning. A 10:1 or 15:1 ratio of Taq to proofreader polymerase will still generate enough 3' A overhangs for TA cloning.
- Recommended polymerases include Platinum Taq, Accuprime Taq, Platinum or Accuprime Taq High Fidelity, AmpliTaq, AmpliTaq Gold, or AmpliTaq Gold 360.
Blunt cloning:
- Use a proofreading enzyme such as Platinum SuperFi DNA Polymerase.
Directional TOPO cloning:
- Platinum SuperFi DNA Polymerase works well.
When should I consider reversible integration (Flp-In system) vs irreversible integration (Jump-In system)?
Use irreversible integration (Jump-In system) if the transgene should be sustained in the mammalian genome for a long time. Use reversible integration such as Flp-In system if the transgene needs to be replaced with another gene of interest after a short period of time.
What is the difference between Jump-In and Flp-In systems?
The Jump-In system is PhiC31-integrase mediated and is a stable, targeted, and irreversible mammalian expression system, involving one integration step. The Jump-In TI (Targeted Integration) system needs two integration steps, both of which are targeted and irreversible. In contrast, the Flp-In system is a stable, targeted mammalian expression system that is reversible. The first integration is random (integration of pFRT/lacZeo) and the second integration (integration of the Flp-In expression vector) is targeted but reversible.
In the Flp-In system, how can one explain the presence of hygromycin-resistant clones that are also resistant to Zeocin antibiotic and are lacZ positive?
We have observed in-house that in cells where the FRT site has integrated into a very transcriptionally active locus in the host cell genome (seen more commonly in Flp-In CHO and Flp-In 293 cells but can also happen in Flp-In 3T3 cells and any other Flp-In host cell line), there is some "read-through" transcription and translation of the lacZ-Zeocin ORF post Flp-In recombination, even though the lacZ-Zeocin ORF does not have a bona fide promoter and ATG. In such cases, the hygromycin-resistant clones would also be lacZ positive and Zeocinantibiotic-resistant. To make sure that the integration is FRT site-specific and not random, we recommend doing a parallel control transfection with no pOG44 present. This should yield no surviving clones upon hygromycin selection, indicating that all the hygromycin-resistant clones obtained in the presence of pOG44 are indeed Flp recombinase-dependent and hence have the gene of interest integrated at the FRT site. Also, a Southern blot analysis of these clones will help verify that they do indeed have proper FRT integration of the gene of interest despite the expression of lacZ (although this is typically not necessary). Post Flp-Inrecombination, as long as you see hygromycin-resistant clones, we recommend that you select them and assay them for expression of your gene of interest.
Find additional tips, troubleshooting help, and resources within our
Protein Expression Support Center.