Labeling Using Fluorescent Proteins
Fluorescent proteins can be especially useful in live-cell imaging
By producing modified forms of fluorescent proteins first found in nature, scientist have created a diverse set of imaging tools that are especially useful in live-cell imaging experiments.
Get tips for selecting the best fluorescent protein for your imaging experiment, designing your FP fusion protein, and introducing it into your cells.
Using fluorescent proteins (FPs) for cell imaging
|Some organisms make proteins that are naturally fluorescent, and scientists have developed techniques to use these proteins as tools in fluorescence microscopy. These FPs can be especially useful in live-cell imaging, where you may want to perform time-lapse microscopy to see how your targets are functioning within the cell. FPs are incorporated as protein markers by fusing an FP gene to your target gene. The host cell will then produce your target protein with the fluorescent marker permanently attached, so there is no need to add a fluorescent dye to the sample. The first fluorescent protein to demonstrate utility as a cell biology tool was Green Fluorescent Protein (GFP). It was originally isolated from the Pacific Northwest jellyfish, Aequorea victoria, in the 1960s and 1970s but wasn’t widely used as a tool in microbiology until its complete gene sequence was determined in the 1990s.|
Unique fluorescent protein properties
FPs have now been isolated from other sea organisms, including sea pansy, coral, and sea anemone. Many of these FPs have unique properties compared to GFP such as red emission or photoconversion, which is a transition from a green- to red-emitting state.
Crystal Jellies in Love, Photo by Nadine Schaeffer/CC
Red coral, Photo by Nomore3Xfive/CC
Non-Aequorea victoria–sourced FPs
Selecting the best fluorescent protein
If you are considering creating a fluorescent fusion protein to use in fluorescence imaging, GFP—or more specifically, the enhanced version of the original Aequorea victoria GFP called enhanced GFP or EGFP—is your best choice. It’s monomeric, bright, well behaved, noninvasive, and virtually indestructible. It’s tried and true, so regardless of organism or application, EGFP is your best bet.
On the other hand, if you need to image in the red channel, then mCherry is the best choice. There are many red FPs described in literature, but none has more publications and has an emission spectrum that better matches a Texas Red® filter cube than mCherry.
Venus is an extremely bright, monomeric yellow FP, but it doesn’t match standard microscope filter sets very well, so you will end up struggling to capture your signal if you use Venus. While the blue end of the spectrum can be very attractive, quite frankly, unless you have an incredibly abundant target, you’re going to want to stay away from most blue FPs, since the signal from those will be much dimmer than EGFP or mCherry.
Optimal placement of your gene relative to the FP gene
It’s best to place your gene of interest on the 3’ end of the DNA sequence or what will become the C-terminus of the FP fusion. Structural and truncation analysis has shown that the N-terminus of GFP is very susceptible to truncation, whereas the C-terminus is less ordered. Most FPs, and certainly those derived from Aequorea victoria GFP, have “floppy” C-termini. This means there are many more degrees of freedom available to overcome possible steric hindrances that can arise from 5’ or N-terminal fusions. Therefore, place your gene of interest on the C-terminal end of the FP for the best chance of successful expression.
Figure 2. Optimal placement of your gene of interest is on the C-terminal end of the fluorescent protein gene.
Introducing your FP construct into your cells
Next you’ll need to pick the best way to introduce your construct into your cells. Lipid transfection or viral transduction are commonly used methods.
Common applications for fluorescent fusion proteins
Fixing cells containing GFP
In general, fix cells using 4% paraformaldehyde (PFA) for 15 minutes. Wash several times with PBS before moving on to a blocking/permeabilization step. However, the real trick is to adjust the pH of your PFA solution to pH 7.4. FPs in general, and certainly most GFP variants, lose fluorescence below about pH 6.0. See Fix, Perm & Block protocol.
Investigating and correcting weak signals from GFP fusion proteins
Nothing is more frustrating than finally getting your construct into cells only to observe little or no GFP expression. Reasons for low expression can include a promoter that is poorly matched to the host organism, steric hindrance of your fusion with the folding of GFP, expression of a multimeric subunit that is destined to end up in the endoplasmic reticulum, or even a cloning error. Whatever the case, DON’T give up.
If you see weak fluorescence, try an anti-GFP antibody to boost the signal that you do have. Of course, you’re likely going to have to fix your sample to use the antibody, but you can also change the color of GFP, for example by selecting secondary antibodies with far-red fluorescence.
If you see absolutely no sign from your GFP construct, then start by doing a western blot with an anti-GFP or anti-target antibody. This will help you decide if you need to go back and check the sequence and perhaps redo a subcloning step, or to see if your protein is quickly being degraded or—more commonly—that it’s improperly folded.