Search
Search
The DNA damage response (DDR) pathways are critical to maintaining genome stability and integrity by detecting and correcting DNA damage. Activation of the precise pathway and mechanism of repair depends on the type of DNA damage. The inability to repair DNA damage is a critical factor in the development and progression of cancers.
Fundamental research in hereditary breast and ovarian cancers revealed the key roles of BRCA1/2 in the genetic predisposition to cancer and their function in the homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway. Subsequently, loss of BRCA1/2 function has been well-studied as a cause of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) that results in genomic instability. In addition to loss of BRCA1/2 function, alterations in other genes involved in DNA repair pathways, either germline or somatic, can be found in other cancer types, including prostate and pancreatic cancers.
DNA repair pathways are increasingly recognized as therapeutic targets, and further research on regulation of DDR pathways can contribute to better understanding of genome integrity, with implications for innovative treatment strategies for multiple tumor types.
HRD is a phenotype characterized by the inability of a cell to effectively repair double-stranded DNA breaks using the HRR pathway. The HRR pathway is an efficient and error-free pathway for accurate repair of double-stranded DNA breaks.1 The use of the template DNA strand enables high-fidelity repair of DNA damage to restore genome integrity. BRCA1/2 proteins play critical roles in DNA repair by the HRR pathway and act as tumor suppressors. Cells with a compromised HRR pathway caused by alterations in BRCA1/2 or other HRR genes can have a reduced capacity to accurately repair double-stranded DNA breaks. This results in an increased accumulation of genomic alterations due to reliance on other error-prone repair pathways and, in turn, higher risk of cancer.
Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerases (PARPs) are involved in various cellular processes, including base excision repair of single-stranded breaks. Blocking base excision repair with PARP inhibitors results in accumulation of DNA single-stranded breaks and replication fork collapse. This leads to DNA double-stranded breaks that can no longer be repaired in cells deficient in the HRR pathway.1 Thus, inhibiting PARPs induces cell death in HR-deficient cancer cells by the mechanism of synthetic lethality. (Figure 1)
Figure 1: Synthetic lethality
There are two principal approaches for identifying the homologous recombination status of tumors:
Potential causes of HRD can be identified by sequencing genes involved in the HRR pathway (Figure 2). BRCA1/2 play prominent roles in the HRR pathway, and impaired BRCA function is the most studied mechanism in tumor cells that results in HRD.1 Beyond BRCA1/2, genetic or epigenetic alterations in other HRR genes have been associated with the HRD phenotype, and their clinical implications are an active area of research.1
The consequences of HRD can be assessed by evidence of genomic scarring or instability. The inability to repair DNA in tumors that are HR-deficient results in the cells’ reliance on error-prone DNA repair through alternative pathways. This leads to an increased accumulation of genomic scars, irrespective of the underlying cause. Studies on breast and ovarian cancers have identified patterns or signatures associated with HRD. Quantifying genomic instability generally involves measuring somatic copy number variation across the tumor genome.1
The Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus is a pan-cancer targeted next-generation sequencing (NGS) solution that provides comprehensive genomic profiling across more than 500 genes, including HRR genes and complex biomarkers such as microsatellite instability, tumor mutational burden, and HRD through the genomic instability metric (GIM).
GIM is a quantitative metric that summarizes unbalanced copy number changes using genomic segmentation. Multiple types of unbalanced copy number events are included to generate a metric that measures genomic instability as a consequence of HRD. The Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus enables detection of HRR genes that may cause HRD, as well as reporting the consequences—i.e., genomic scarring—through the GIM.
Figure 2: HRR pathway. Non-gray genes are covered in the Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus. Teal genes were included in clinical trials of prostate cancer clinical research samples.
Table 1: Oncomine solutions for homologous recombination research
| Panel | Specimen types | Nucleic acid types | Alteration types | Complex biomarkers | Homologous recombination assessment | Total number of genes | DNA or RNA input amount | Instrument | Turnaround time* |
| Oncomine BRCA Research Assay GX | FFPE tissue, whole blood | DNA | Substitutions, insertions, deletions, and large genomic rearrangements including exon-level and gene-level deletions or duplications | – | HRR: 2 genes | 2 | 10 ng | Ion Torrent Genexus system | 1 day |
| Oncomine HRR Pathway Predesigned Panel | FFPE tissue | DNA | Substitutions, insertions, deletions, and large genomic rearrangements including exon-level and gene-level deletions or duplications | – | HRR: 26 genes | 28 | 10 ng | Ion GeneStudio S5 System | 4 days |
| Oncomine Comprehensive Assay Plus | FFPE tissue | DNA, RNA | Substitutions, insertions, deletions, copy number variants, fusions, and large genomic rearrangements including exon-level and gene-level deletions or duplications | gene-level LOH, MSI, TMB, HRD | HRR: 46 genes; HRD: GIM | >500 | 20 ng | Ion GeneStudio S5 System | 4 days |
* Timing varies by number of samples and sample type.
Figure 3: Genomic instability metric. The GIM is a quantitative approach to identifying genomic instability associated with HRD. GIM summarizes unbalanced copy number changes using genomic segmentation with multiple types of unbalanced copy number events included. Examples of copy number gain and loss are shown in red and purple, respectively.
For Research Use Only. Not for use in diagnostic procedures.
PMR-000679